At the end of the school year, I found out that the media specialist from the high school across the street from my K8 school was retiring. I decided to apply for her position. There were several reasons why but they do not relate to the topic at hand. Anyways, I was selected for the position at the high school, and will be working there come August.
I do wish to say that technology integration was a huge reason why I think I was selected. I was able to knowledgeably discuss podcasts and blogs, and how I could collaborate with teachers and work with students using these technologies. I also mentioned starting an online class for incoming 9th graders to ensure that they are familiar with library resources and research skills. This will enable all students to relate to the library, on their own time, with technology they are familiar with, even though their teachers may not wish to collaborate with me at that time. The surprise I saw in the interview committee when I was discussing these ideas made me wonder about how technology is actually being used in the schools. It seems to be a secret that only certain people are aware of.
Upon returning from my trip to Canada, I was asked to sit in on four interviews for my previous position. I was able to ask questions about the applicants' background in technology, and how they would integrate it in the media center and classrooms. Imagine my surprise when these answers failed to mention any up to date technology. The media center at my old school has audio enhancement, a smart board, document camera, LCD projector, dvd/VCR, 11 computers with Internet access, a scanner, 2 OPAC stations, a teacher station, and the circulation computer. We also had a digital camera before it stopped working. It was an older model with a floppy disk (almost useless as the teacher stations no longer have floppy disk drives) and I already asked for a new camera in the new school year. The video production class consisted of a standalone Casablanca Avio unit for editing, and a number of mini DV cameras.
The applicants had many different answers for the technology question. One talked about online databases and automated library systems. Another mentioned all the courses she had taken in Microsoft applications. But as the reading teacher pointed out, she never mentioned how she would integrate this knowledge into her curriculum and help students and teachers. Another said that she could teach PowerPoint and hook up a projector. One applicant was well aware of different Internet applications and software, mentioning some that the reading teacher was busy writing down so she could explore them. Yet, there was very little discussion of technology integration and how technology could be used to enhance and further student's learning.
This got me thinking. Would I have reacted to these questions in the same way if I was not currently taking Leadership in Technology? The answer, sad as it is, is probably yes. Although we read about blogs and podcasts weekly in the school library literature, very few of us probably are motivated to start something in our schools if we are the first to do so. When we have no mentors to guide the way, are we all willing to be the pioneers? Media specialists have so much to do as it is, are we willing to take on yet another responsibility? Yet, if we are to prove that the media center is the center of all learning, we need to be the ones who are willing to try new things. It is up to us to be the mentors for our teachers, to show them that, yes, this is possible.
I'm excited to be the one at the high school demonstrating blogs and podcasts. Now, if I can just figure out video streaming...